Posting'socially awkward penguin'meme is#169violat

5 min read

Deviation Actions

iLovePhotographyClub's avatar
Published:
3.5K Views

Posting 'Socially Awkward Penguin' meme is technically a copyright violation



Source
petapixel.com/2015/09/05/getty…

Well, this is a bit… awkward. Getty Images recently threatened a lawsuit against German blog Get Digital, which had published the famous ‘Socially Awkward Penguin’ meme without first obtaining permission.

That is right: you technically need permission to use the meme. According to Getty Images, the meme contains an image originally shot by nature photographer George F. Mobley. The blog ended up paying Getty Images $868 for the copyright violation.

The original emails are in German, but a quick translation reveals that the blog was asked to cough up $836.39 or possibly force being taken to trial. The “legal situation appeared quite clear,” the blog writes. They paid the claim and deleted the images they had initially used.

“But the Awkward Penguin is not just a random image we stole from Getty’s database, but one of the most well known internet memes,” writes Get Digital. “Therefore the question arises why obviously no one in the whole internet knows that the image right of this penguin are property of a picture agency that sends out bills for the usage of this image.”

“Although it is possible to find information about the photographer of the penguin, it is impossible to find anything about Getty and their license payment claims.”

What’s more, it appears that Getty Images is also sending out “gag orders” to copyright violators, demanding that they remain silent on the issue. “Getty is simply threatening to contact lawyers in order to force the affected persons to maintain silence and just pay the amount claimed,” Get Digital writes.

As of now, Get Digital is yet to hear back from Getty Images about breaking the ‘confidentiality agreement’ that was demanded. The blog has since created a substitute “Socially Awkward Penguin” that is free of copyright violation; it is officially in the public domain, so you may share it without fear of legal issues:


© 2015 - 2024 iLovePhotographyClub
Comments2
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Siochanna's avatar
While I do think artists should have a chance to profit from their work, Getty Images is a corporation and as such is incapable of shooting images.  Unless the photographer is getting their fair share of the fees these guys are charging, I don't see how it's right even if it is legal.  I'm sure it is legal, but corporations will never be more than an abstract idea.  You need a physical human being in order to get art.  That's just all there is to it. 

The gag order makes me extremely suspicious.  Why are they trying to keep this a secret?  The presence or absence of a copyright mark doesn't affect legality, but it seems that they want more violators rather than fewer.